Tushar Chitlangia, Vipasha Verma India and Brazil ratified the India-Brazil Investment Treaty this year. With this began a new era of diplomacy in foreign investment. The systematic institution of investment arbitration has been evolving over the years and with it, the Investor-State Dispute Settlement ('ISDS') mechanism has been the ideal model for many countries. However, owing to fallacies in the model, the judgment by international arbitration tribunals has led States to

Paras Jain* Introduction The decision given by the CJEU in the case of Slowakische Republik (Slovak Republic) v. Achmea BV [1] ('Achmea ruling') is being called a loud clap of thunder [2]. The decision will have a lasting effect on the Investor State Dispute Settlement ('ISDS') system in Europe. In this blog post, the author discusses how the supremacy and autonomy of the European Union ('EU') law have been guiding factors in the struggle to create a comprehensive dispute set